FEDS Note: Cross-border venture capital and reverse technology flows
Cross-Border Venture Capital and Technology Spillovers
Foreign Investment in Silicon Valley
In recent years, there has been a surge in foreign venture capital investments in Silicon Valley, particularly from China. This trend has raised concerns in the U.S. as these investments often target critical industries like artificial intelligence, robotics, and virtual reality.
While academic research on entrepreneurship has explored various aspects of venture capital financing, the impact of cross-border capital flows on technology transfer has received scant attention. Recent research, however, has shed light on this topic, focusing on foreign corporate venture capital (CVC) investments in U.S. startups and their implications for technology spillovers.
Determinants and Effects of Cross-Border CVC Investments
The empirical analysis reveals that foreign countries tend to invest in U.S. startups specializing in technological areas where they lag behind. This suggests that these investments are strategic "responses" to address technology gaps.
Furthermore, the study finds that cross-border CVC investments foster innovation and knowledge spillovers in the financing country. After investing in U.S. startups, countries exhibit increased patenting and citation activity in the technology classes targeted by the startups. These findings are particularly pronounced for Chinese investments in Silicon Valley.
The magnitude of spillovers is found to vary depending on the nature of the technology, with stronger effects in classes relying heavily on basic research. Similarly, classes with patents subject to secrecy orders witness greater knowledge flows.
Benefits and Concerns
While cross-border CVC investments can facilitate technology transfer and innovation, they also raise concerns about the potential for foreign entities to gain and exploit insights from their interactions with the invested companies.
Conclusion
The research on cross-border CVC investments fills a vital gap in understanding the dynamic relationship between foreign investment, technology transfer, and innovation. The findings highlight the benefits and potential risks associated with these investments, which warrant further analysis and policy attention to maximize their positive impact and mitigate potential risks.